ALLEGED CHILD GROOMER: MOHAMMED NAUMAN CHARGED:

Hi and welcome to this Jason King Insight:Hi and welcome to this Jason King Insight:

MOHAMMED NAUMAN, 31, has been charged with attempting to groom and meet a 14 year old School Girl for Sex.

In his online communications he told the child that he had never had sex before but when confronted he revealed that has a family in his home country of Pakistan.

MOHAMMED NAUMAN claimed that he had good intentions for the child and was looking for her to become his second wife.

He has been in this country for one year.

ACCESS TO THE LAW: Understanding the Crime and SentencingACCESS TO THE LAW: Understanding the Crime and Sentencing

As part of our campaign to improve citizens’ access and understanding of UK Criminal law, we will be explaining the relevant UK legislation surrounding any case law relevant to our articles:As part of our campaign to improve citizens’ access and understanding of UK Criminal law, we will be explaining the relevant UK legislation surrounding any case law relevant to our articles:

Grooming a child for sexual purposes is a serious criminal offence under UK Law.The Sexual Offences Act 2003The Sexual Offences Act 2003specifically addresses online grooming, making it illegal to communicate with a child with the intention of meeting for sexual activity.

Even if no physical contact occurs, the intent to exploit a child sexually is enough to secure a conviction. Sending explicit material to a child, as seen in this case, further compounds the severity of the offence, as it exposes minors to harmful and inappropriate content.

Convictions can lead to lengthy prison sentences, as well as inclusion on the sex offenders’ register, which significantly restricts future employment and travel. Understanding these legal protections is vital for safeguarding vulnerable individuals, especially as online grooming cases continue to rise.

Additionally In the UK,Ignorance of the law is not a valid defenseIgnorance of the law is not a valid defense. This principle is based on the idea that the law is publicly accessible, and citizens have a duty to be informed. The courts should operate under “Ignorantia juris non excusat”, meaning ignorance of the law excuses no one.

Simply put, claiming you didn’t know an action was illegal doesn’t absolve responsibility; you’re expected to make yourself aware of legal standards. This maintains fairness, ensuring all citizens are held to the same legal expectations, regardless of their knowledge or intent.

Well, that’s all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all stay safe, and I’ll see you then.Well, that’s all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all stay safe, and I’ll see you then.

Jason KingJason King

Birmingham City-DeskBirmingham City-Desk

Twitter (X) @JasonKingNewsTwitter (X) @JasonKingNews

Jasonkingnews@gmail.comJasonkingnews@gmail.comJasonkingnews@gmail.com