Killers Carroll and Semper Jailed for Life After Brutally Stabbing 16-Year-Old Taye Faik Near His Edmonton Home

Hi and Welome to this Video Production News Court Report.Hi and Welome to this Video Production News Court Report.

Two men have been sentenced to life imprisonment after being found guilty of the murder of 16-year-old Taye Faik, who was fatally stabbed near his home in Edmonton on the night of 1 October 2023. Bernard Carroll, 20, and Josiah Semper, 19, were convicted at Snaresbrook Crown Court after a trial that revealed a meticulously planned attack, carried out as the victim walked his dog just yards from his front door.

The court heard that Carroll and Semper ambushed Faik in Kendal Gardens. Semper, armed with a flick knife, delivered the fatal blow, while Carroll, fully aware of the intended violence, drove the pair to the scene in a stolen car. Both men were masked and fled in the vehicle, leaving Taye fatally injured. Despite making it to his home, where he collapsed, he was pronounced dead at the scene shortly afterward.

Detective Chief Inspector Joanna Yorke of the Met’s Specialist Crime Command, who led the investigation, described the attack as both “shocking” and “brutal,” underscoring that there was a “significant degree of planning involved.” The investigation used CCTV footage to trace the movements of the attackers and their vehicle—a stolen car with false plates, abandoned shortly after the attack in a nearby car park.

Carroll was arrested on 6 November 2023 after being located at an address in Edmonton. He refused to cooperate with investigators, declining to answer any questions regarding the attack. Semper had fled to Antigua shortly after the murder but was arrested upon his return to the UK on 17 November. Like Carroll, he refused to answer police questions.

At sentencing, both men were handed life sentences with a minimum term of 22 years. In her closing remarks, the judge reflected on the calculated nature of the crime and the senseless loss of life it caused, calling the attack “a heinous act of violence against a young man whose life was cut tragically short.” The court heard that Carroll’s role in the murder was pivotal, as he provided transportation to the scene with the knowledge that Semper was armed and prepared for a violent confrontation.

In addressing the court, DCI Yorke noted, “This conviction and the subsequent sentence should demonstrate the serious consequences and loss of life associated with carrying a knife. I hope that the sentences bring some small measure of comfort to Taye’s family, who have endured both the trauma of his loss and the difficult trial process.”

Both defendants maintained their silence throughout police questioning and the trial, and neither expressed any remorse for their actions.

ACCESS TO THE LAW: Understanding the Crime and SentencingACCESS TO THE LAW: Understanding the Crime and Sentencing

As part of our campaign to improve citizens’ access and understanding of UK Criminal law, we will be explaining the relevant UK legislation surrounding any case law relevant to our articles:As part of our campaign to improve citizens’ access and understanding of UK Criminal law, we will be explaining the relevant UK legislation surrounding any case law relevant to our articles:

This case serves as a stark reminder of the legal and societal ramifications of carrying and using knives. The UK has stringent laws regarding knife possession, governed by theOffensive Weapons Act 2019 and Section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988Offensive Weapons Act 2019 and Section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

Under these laws, it is illegal to carry any knife with a blade longer than 3 inches without lawful reason, and possession of a weapon in public places can lead to severe penalties, including imprisonment. The maximum penalty for carrying an illegal knife is four years in prison and an unlimited fine, with increased sentences when the weapon is used to commit violent acts.

In cases of murder, as seen here, where a knife is the weapon of choice, courts treat the use of such weapons as an aggravating factor, often resulting in mandatory life sentences.

Judges have limited discretion in sentencing where life imprisonment is required, though they may determine the minimum term to be served before the possibility of parole, as was done in the case of Carroll and Semper.

A life sentence does not mean automatic release after the minimum term; rather, the Parole Board must be satisfied that the offender no longer poses a risk to the public before release is granted. If released, the offender remains on licence for the rest of their life, meaning they are subject to recall to prison if they breach the conditions of their release.

The sentences handed down in this case, with a minimum term of 22 years, reflect the gravity of the crime and the planning involved. This case highlights the judicial system’s firm stance on knife crime, reinforcing that those involved in premeditated violence with deadly weapons will face the full weight of the law.

Well, that’s all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all stay safe, and I’ll see you then.Well, that’s all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all stay safe, and I’ll see you then.

Bénédict Tarot FreemanBénédict Tarot Freeman

Editor-at-LargeEditor-at-Large

VPN City-DeskVPN City-Desk

citydesk@vpnldn.co.ukcitydesk@vpnldn.co.ukcitydesk@vpnldn.co.uk